Welcome to the Homepage of SCC

The objective of this journal was and is, to publish – different to many other journals – also peer re-viewed scientific contributions, which contradict the often very unilateral climate hypotheses of the IPCC and thus, to open the view to alternative interpretations of climate change.

The journal is a non-profit venture, in the start-up phase hosted and strongly supported by the Norwegian Climate Realists Also, other climate organizations and their members support the journal with qualified publications or their engagement as co-editors and review­ers.

However, to be internationally better recognized as a largely indepen­dently operating journal, with the beginning of 2025 SCC is published by the SCC Publishing association.

In 2021 SCC started in the classical format publishing two volumes. Since 2022 it is operating as an Open Access Journal with very moder­ate publication fees, with a new layout and new website. In 2022 three volumes, in 2023 five volumes and in 2024 four volumes could be published, consisting of research and review articles, of essays, discussion papers, conference summaries and book reviews (see Papers). 

So, within less than four years SCC could develop to an international­ly recognized Journal of Climate Sciences presenting alternative views for a much broader discussion and understanding of climate pheno­mena.

We try to continue this successful work and at the same time to gain further experts on the wide field of climate sciences, who can streng­then the editorial work and support these objectives.

Stein Storlie Bergsmark                          Hermann Harde
SCC Publishing                                    SCC’s Editorial Board 

News


Completed Volumes in 2025

Volume 5.1 June 2025

This volume contains 

-an invited paper of William van Wijn-gaarden and Will Happer about the radiation transport in clouds, 

-a review article about the role of CO2 in Global Warming, written by Grok 3,

-three research articles about the pitfalls in global warming (Dai Ato), about the reliability of climate model fore-casts for Policy Making (Kesten Green ad Willie Soon), and the role of sea surface temperatures on atmospheric CO2 (Bernard Robbins),

Volume 5.2 June 2025

This is a Special Issue first published in Pattern Recognition in Physics (PRP: Vol. 1 & 2, 2013-2014) where various aspects of the Planetary–Solar–Terrestrial interaction are highlighted in 12 independent papers. But the original publications disappeared. Since they contain important science, the SCC has decided on re-issuing the original papers.

New Publications

  • Theodorus Bernardus Wolters: Fact checking Climate Science

    The presentation analyses the four existing lines of proof for the CAGW hypothesis and concludes that all four fail: The first line of proof is the “proof by contradiction”: the observed temperature change can only be explained by the known climate forcings if CO₂ is responsible for all the warming. However, the ensemble of forcings…

    Continue reading…


  • Dominique Görlitz: Climate Change, Maritime Mobility and Cultural Contacts

    Climatic and geomorphological changes can accelerate mobility, resource crises and the reorganization of settlement areas. The presentation ‘Archaeology and Climate’ therefore combines the Holocene flooding of the Persian Gulf, the emergence of the Naqada culture in Egypt and maritime contacts as far as the Atlantic into a large-scale working hypothesis. The present contribution examines which…

    Continue reading…


  • Ian Dexter Palmer: Maunder Missing Link Implies Solar Forcing Cannot be Ignored

    Our approach honors the Maunder Minimum and the Modern Maximum, the two bookends, and also honors the large temperature increase of 0.75℃ between 1700 and 1950. This temperature increase is attributed to solar forcing, since greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations are very small or non-existent in this interval. If the total solar irradiance, TSI, data of…

    Continue reading…


  • John F. Clauser: Global Warming, Climate Change, and Scientific Consensus have not been Proven

    The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), along with its various collaborators and contributors (IPCC et al.), forecast an impending climate crisis with catastrophic consequences for the Earth’s population. They predict an alarming increase in the frequency of dangerous extreme weather events and other bad natural phenomena. This work provides a quantitative scientific…

    Continue reading…


  • Volume 6.3 October 2026

    This is a special issue of Science of Climate Change, which contains summaries from the 17th International EIKE Climate and Energy Conference, IKEK-17, which took place in Halle, Germany, June 26 – 27, 2026. Science of Climate Change is an independent, peer-reviewed and fully open-access scholarly journal devoted to advancing scientific understanding of the Earth’s…

    Continue reading…


  • Ronan Connolly: Adjusting the Data or Rewriting History?

    Annual “hottest-year-on-record” headlines rely on global temperature-anomaly indices built from weather-station data that are incomplete, geographically biased and contaminated by non-climatic artefacts (urbanization, poor siting, instrument changes). Automated homogenization algorithms, especially NOAA’s Pairwise Homogenization Algorithm, are widely believed to overcome these challenges. However, in practice they often rewrite station records on a daily (or monthly)…

    Continue reading…


  • Anja Arndt: Europe’s Energy Supply under Pressure

    This paper summarises a presentation on the implications of the EU Methane Regulation (EU) 2024/1787 on the reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector from the political perspective of the author as an AfD Member of the European Parliament and representative of the Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN) Group. The central thesis of the…

    Continue reading…


  • Marc Morano: The Great Reject

    This paper outlines a historic shift in global climate policy and public perception, detailing the rapid deflation of the “Great Reset” and net-zero agendas as of 2026. It argues that the climate movement has hit its lowest point of influence in fifty years due to three primary drivers: the collapse of institutional appeal to authority…

    Continue reading…