Debate
Ferdinand Engelbeen: Comment on Understanding Increasing Atmospheric CO2 by Hermann Harde
SCC Volume 3.1. Abstract While many of the points made by Harde (2023) [1] are right, a few points are not right and need correction. That includes allegations of certain statements of the IPCC they never did or intended in the way that Harde interpretated. Introduction.I was preparing a large comment on the paper by…
Edwin X Berry: Nature Controls the CO2 Increase II
SCC Volume 3.2. Abstract Climate alarmism and politics are based on the invalid United Nations (UN) assumption that human CO2 is the dominant cause of the CO2 increase above 280 ppm, or since 1750. This assumption conflicts with UN’s own data, is derived from invalid circular reasoning, and violates physics.UN data show human carbon emissions…
David E. Andrews: The Root Cause of Atmospheric CO2 Rise. More Clear Thinking
SCC Volume 3.2. Abstract This paper continues the debate sponsored by Science of Climate Change on the root causes of atmospheric CO2 rise during the last century. A little progress has been made in finding common ground, but not very much. A suggestion is made to make the discussion more productive. Introduction and a ProposalIn…
Hermann Harde : Reply to a Comment on: Understanding Increasing Atmospheric CO2
SCC Volume 3.1. This reply refutes all misstatements, that were published by F. Engelbeen as Comment on an article “Understanding Increasing Atmospheric CO2 “ by Hermann Harde. IntroductionAll climate experts agree that the basis for calculating changes of the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is the balance equation or Conservation Law, which sums up all…