Skip to content
No results
  • About us
    • Privacy Policy GDPR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial board
  • Home
  • News
  • Papers
    • Articles
    • Essay
    • Volumes and issues 
    • Comments
    • Linked datasets 
    • Debate
    • Proceedings
    • Book Reviews
    • In Memoriam
  • Submission guidelines
    • How to submit
    • Word template
    • Rules for referees
Science of climate change
  • Editorial Board
  • Submission guidelines
    • How to submit
    • Word template
    • Rules for referees
  • Volumes and issues
    • Volume 4.4 December 2024
    • Volume 4.3 December 2024
    • Volume 4.2 December 2024
    • Volume 4.1 June 2024
    • Volume 3.5 December 2023
    • Volume 3.4 December 2023
    • Volume 3.3 September 2023
    • Volume 3.2 June 2023
    • Volume 3.1 March 2023
    • Volume 2.3 December 2022
    • Volume 2.2 June 2022
    • Volume 2.1 March 2022
    • Volume 1.2 December 2021
    • Volume 1.1 August 2021
  • Papers
    • Recent Papers
    • Articles
    • Review Articles
    • Essay
    • Comments
    • Debate
    • Proceedings
    • Book Reviews
    • In Memoriam
    • Linked datasets 
  • About us
  • Debate, Papers, Volume 3.1

Ferdinand Engelbeen: Comment on Understanding Increasing Atmospheric CO2 by Hermann Harde

SCC Volume 3.1. Abstract While many of the points made by Harde (2023) [1] are right, a few points are not right and need correction. That includes allegations of certain statements of the IPCC they never did or intended in…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 9 November, 2023
  • Articles, Papers, Volume 3.1

Martin T. Hovland: The Holocene Climate Change Story from Sola part III

SCC Volume 3.1. Towards the end of the Weichsel ice age came a period with warmer climate referred to as the Late Glacial Interstadial (c.14,670 to 12,900 years BP), when the great inland ice started to retreat. This retreat was…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 30 March, 2023
  • Debate, Papers, Volume 3.1

Hermann Harde : Reply to a Comment on: Understanding Increasing Atmospheric CO2

SCC Volume 3.1. This reply refutes all misstatements, that were published by F. Engelbeen as Comment on an article “Understanding Increasing Atmospheric CO2 “ by Hermann Harde. IntroductionAll climate experts agree that the basis for calculating changes of the CO2…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 30 March, 2023
  • Articles, Papers, Volume 3.1

Jonas Rosén and Sten Kaijser: Analytical Carbon Cycle Impulse Response Function

SCC Volume 3.1. The purpose of this paper is to derive an analytical impulse response function (IRF), for the carbon cycle between atmosphere and sea. The analysis is starting from the Box-Diffusion model (BDM) given by Oeschger et al. The…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 30 March, 2023
  • Articles, Papers, Volume 3.1

Edwin X Berry: Nature Controls the CO2 Increase

SCC Volume 3.1. Climate alarmism and politics are based on the invalid United Nations (UN) assumption that human CO2 is the dominant cause of the CO2 increase above 280 ppm, or since 1750. This assumption conflicts with UN’s own data,…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 30 March, 2023
  • Articles, Papers, Volume 3.1

Hermann Harde: Understanding Increasing Atmospheric CO2

SCC Volume 3.1. The carbon cycle is of fundamental importance to estimate the influence of anthropogenic emissions on the atmospheric CO2 concentration, and thus, to classify the impact of these emissions on global warming. Different models have been developed, which…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 30 March, 2023
  • Articles, Papers, Volume 3.1

David E. Andrews: Clear Thinking about Atmosspheric CO2

SCC Volume 3.1. Several articles have been published in this journal purporting to show that the well-documented rise in atmospheric CO2 is a natural phenomenon rather than human caused. His note reviews the overwhelming case that human activities are the…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 30 March, 2023
  • Articles, Papers, Volume 3.1

John A. Parmentola: Celestial Mechanics and Estimating the Termination of the Holocene Warm Period

SCC Volume 3.1. This paper addresses several issues concerning Milankovitch Theory and its relationship to paleoclimate data over the last 800,000 years. The approach taken treats the insolation as it is physically, a time-dependent wave. A parameter free model, based…

  • Jan-Erik Solheim
  • 23 March, 2023
  • Privacy Policy GDPR

Science of Climate Change is a not for profit independent scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications and review papers on all aspects of climate change. We publish Open Access, but may ask for a small fee by authors to cover publication cost.

Copyright © 2025 - WordPress Theme by CreativeThemes
Log in